Farm Subsidy information
Ida County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Ida County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,324
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ida County, Iowa totaled $347,451,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Roger L Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $2,235,969 |
2 | Volkert Brothers | Holstein, IA 51025 | $2,228,718 |
3 | Phyllis E Groth | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $2,168,693 |
4 | Ruser & Cipperley | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,962,064 |
5 | Ashton Valley Farms Partnership | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,927,120 |
6 | Klint Jason Cork | Galva, IA 51020 | $1,614,543 |
7 | Dennis Dwaine Bubke | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,569,015 |
8 | Conwell Lee Larson | Kiron, IA 51448 | $1,563,800 |
9 | Curtis Leroy Larson | Arthur, IA 51431 | $1,560,887 |
10 | Jerry Allen Groth | Battle Creek, IA 51006 | $1,506,449 |
11 | Daniel R Roeder | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $1,497,053 |
12 | Troy Donavon Hare | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $1,491,484 |
13 | H & J Farms Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,469,987 |
14 | Robert L Butcher | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,460,390 |
15 | Cranston Bros Joint Venture | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $1,450,422 |
16 | Vohs Brothers Inc | Holstein, IA 51025 | $1,424,217 |
17 | Mason James Fleenor | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $1,414,128 |
18 | Sheryl Lanette Larson | Kiron, IA 51448 | $1,412,893 |
19 | Kimberly Rae Larson | Arthur, IA 51431 | $1,395,338 |
20 | Dennis R Roeder | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $1,393,787 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>