Counter Cyclical Program in Kossuth County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,886
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $24,044,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Richard C Simpson Living Trust | Algona, IA 50511 | $81,975 |
2 | Randaw Farms Inc | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $78,445 |
3 | Hardt Farms Incorporated | Swea City, IA 50590 | $76,401 |
4 | Leroy Henry Thilges | Burt, IA 50522 | $75,063 |
5 | Harna Farms Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $74,898 |
6 | Howard Frideres Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $72,619 |
7 | Barry Craig Simpson | Lu Verne, IA 50560 | $71,610 |
8 | Kenneth Michael Laubenthal | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $70,791 |
9 | Eldon Marlyn Beenken | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $69,639 |
10 | Lennon Brandt Ent Inc | Swea City, IA 50590 | $69,517 |
11 | Capesius Brothers Inc | Bode, IA 50519 | $68,636 |
12 | Gary Donald Lickteig | Algona, IA 50511 | $68,615 |
13 | Warren Lynn Waltman | Algona, IA 50511 | $67,100 |
14 | Daniel Wayne Beenken | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $66,367 |
15 | Verlaine Beenken | Buffalo Center, IA 50424 | $66,367 |
16 | James Edward Black | Algona, IA 50511 | $65,633 |
17 | Antoine Acres Inc | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $64,766 |
18 | Ed Naumann Farms Inc | Elmore, MN 56027 | $63,709 |
19 | Elmer James Alt | Algona, IA 50511 | $63,334 |
20 | Harold Heesch Trust | Titonka, IA 50480 | $63,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>