Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,294
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $38,510,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ver Steegh Brothers Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $1,354,966 |
2 | V G Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $1,014,989 |
3 | S & A Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $827,313 |
4 | Oskaloosa Food Products Corporati | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $718,336 |
5 | De Bruin Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $662,763 |
6 | Mahaska Pork Limited | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $618,758 |
7 | River Valley Farms Partnership | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $584,860 |
8 | Augustine & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $515,908 |
9 | Conrad Brothers | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $514,450 |
10 | Spring Creek Family Farms LLC | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $427,326 |
11 | A M Pork LLC | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $293,336 |
12 | Van Waardhuizen Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $237,498 |
13 | Lyle E Nunnikhoven | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $231,069 |
14 | De Jong Brothers | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $216,323 |
15 | Roger Fynaardt | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $211,055 |
16 | Rsd Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $209,594 |
17 | Paul Groenenboom | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $201,431 |
18 | J & J Vande Voort Farm Corp | Pella, IA 50219 | $199,710 |
19 | Franje Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $198,347 |
20 | Allied Gas & Chemical | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $196,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>