Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,294
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $38,510,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William Hol | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $190,180 |
22 | Spoelstra Farms LLC | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $188,614 |
23 | Chamra Farms Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $185,589 |
24 | Augustine Livestock Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $177,459 |
25 | C John Crill | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $170,666 |
26 | Dennis Veldhuizen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $167,521 |
27 | Boender Custom Farming Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $164,778 |
28 | Ver Meer & Uitermarkt LLC | Pella, IA 50219 | $160,474 |
29 | Dbgl Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $150,505 |
30 | New Sharon-stout Farms LLC | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $149,858 |
31 | Par 3 Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $149,172 |
32 | Brent Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $147,796 |
33 | Bryan Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $147,340 |
34 | Mark A Goodman | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $141,531 |
35 | Jackson Drost | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $135,239 |
36 | Graneva Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $133,105 |
37 | M E Molyneux & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $132,435 |
38 | Ben Molyneux | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $130,821 |
39 | Scott Family Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $130,110 |
40 | Holstein Acres Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $128,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”