Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 159
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $3,051,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ver Steegh Brothers Farms | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $148,194 |
2 | Par 3 Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $123,085 |
3 | Bryan Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $104,243 |
4 | Brent Molyneux Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $104,242 |
5 | Thomas Drost | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $92,543 |
6 | River Valley Farms Partnership | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $75,588 |
7 | Donald & Bonnie Vos Family Trust | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $66,460 |
8 | Country Lane Pork Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $64,595 |
9 | Graneva Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $62,683 |
10 | Blanke Farm Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $61,928 |
11 | Steven Roger Boender | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $61,566 |
12 | Keith W Brink | Fremont, IA 52561 | $61,447 |
13 | Keith R Wehrle | Lynnville, IA 50153 | $57,483 |
14 | M E Molyneux & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $56,699 |
15 | Vanden Heuvel Farms Inc | Cedar, IA 52543 | $50,810 |
16 | Rsd Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $48,613 |
17 | Top Pork Building Lc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $47,134 |
18 | Jerome Fynaardt | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $43,804 |
19 | S & A Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $43,588 |
20 | Van Waardhuizen Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $42,613 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>