Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,720
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $102,643,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Andrew Jansen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $465,179 |
22 | Kenneth Slagter | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $462,150 |
23 | Robert Van Gilst | Fremont, IA 52561 | $459,383 |
24 | Ronald L Meinders | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $436,285 |
25 | Allied Gas & Chemical | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $432,931 |
26 | Mark Dunkin | Bussey, IA 50044 | $430,262 |
27 | Kelley J Donham | Iowa City, IA 52240 | $413,412 |
28 | Harley Ver Meer | Pella, IA 50219 | $412,529 |
29 | Chamra Farms Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $402,852 |
30 | Robert Van Weelden | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $398,258 |
31 | Calvin Branderhorst | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $390,419 |
32 | Logan Kuiper | Los Alamos, NM 87544 | $385,083 |
33 | J D Fleener Estate | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $384,743 |
34 | Richard C Hoy Trust | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $383,377 |
35 | Gregory A Gordy | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $382,055 |
36 | Marvin Rozenboom Trust | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $380,023 |
37 | Henry L Van Arkel | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $373,941 |
38 | Arthur Dykstra | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $372,451 |
39 | Linda Kraber | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $364,048 |
40 | Gary Kelderman | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $349,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”