Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,552
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Iowa totaled $380,286,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pinicon Farm | Mc Intire, IA 50455 | $2,237,116 |
2 | Mr Ricky Darrell Sletten | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,657,014 |
3 | Dale L Newton | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $1,569,760 |
4 | Lyle D Newton | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $1,541,789 |
5 | Douglas J Kleckner | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $1,453,051 |
6 | Kendrick William Berg | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,425,652 |
7 | Johanns Farms Ltd | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,420,294 |
8 | Dvorak Brothers | Riceville, IA 50466 | $1,395,357 |
9 | Joseph M Malecek | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,350,494 |
10 | Peter K Berg | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,317,085 |
11 | River View Livestock Co Inc | Riceville, IA 50466 | $1,304,860 |
12 | Tracy L Funk | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,251,258 |
13 | Daniel S Schwarck | Riceville, IA 50466 | $1,206,314 |
14 | Donald R Huftalin Rev Trust - Donald Huftalin | Malta, IL 60150 | $1,177,952 |
15 | Thomas Leon Clark | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,161,691 |
16 | Chisholm-fox Inc | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,143,444 |
17 | Hansen Farm Co Lp | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $1,126,436 |
18 | Gary A Pearson | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,119,905 |
19 | Pork N Pine Hill Inc | Stacyville, IA 50476 | $1,100,246 |
20 | Fox Cattle Co | Riceville, IA 50466 | $1,076,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>