Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Monona County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 612
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Monona County, Iowa totaled $4,871,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bruhn Farms Joint Venture | Mapleton, IA 51034 | $133,075 |
2 | Haveman Family Farm Ptn | Whiting, IA 51063 | $106,352 |
3 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $67,982 |
4 | Melby Brothers Prtsp | Soldier, IA 51572 | $66,851 |
5 | Hobbs Family Farms Inc | Whiting, IA 51063 | $58,172 |
6 | Tim Hodgson Farms Inc | Blencoe, IA 51523 | $48,173 |
7 | Joseph C Oliver | Turin, IA 51040 | $45,211 |
8 | Richard Stanislav | Little Sioux, IA 51545 | $40,582 |
9 | Charles Bentley Farms Inc | Onawa, IA 51040 | $40,050 |
10 | Dennis Oneal | Hornick, IA 51026 | $39,862 |
11 | Adam L Davis | Blencoe, IA 51523 | $39,664 |
12 | Danny Stanislav Incorporated | Blencoe, IA 51523 | $39,583 |
13 | B & B Pike Farm Corporation | Whiting, IA 51063 | $39,099 |
14 | Damon Francis Schrunk | Danbury, IA 51019 | $37,749 |
15 | Rm Farms LLC | Blencoe, IA 51523 | $37,403 |
16 | Donald Mordhorst Incorporated | Soldier, IA 51572 | $36,797 |
17 | Dennis Mordhorst Incorporated | Soldier, IA 51572 | $36,797 |
18 | Matthew Neil Dehn | Onawa, IA 51040 | $36,744 |
19 | Douglas D Nepper | Ute, IA 51060 | $36,193 |
20 | Christopher Carroll Johnson | Moorhead, IA 51558 | $34,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>