Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Palo Alto County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 211
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Palo Alto County, Iowa totaled $3,727,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brown Farms | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $272,205 |
2 | Kwc Farms Inc | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $170,208 |
3 | Wirtz Brothers | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $117,650 |
4 | Tragar Inc | West Bend, IA 50597 | $116,522 |
5 | Thomas P Schnieders | Mallard, IA 50562 | $81,690 |
6 | Todd Jeffery Mathisen | Cylinder, IA 50528 | $80,806 |
7 | Jana Jean Mathisen | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $80,806 |
8 | Craig S Brownlee | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $78,156 |
9 | Jennifer L Brownlee | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $77,232 |
10 | Jim B Crawford | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $70,999 |
11 | Neil Ankeny | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $68,421 |
12 | Robert P Schmidt | Rolfe, IA 50581 | $67,307 |
13 | K & J Kassel Farms Inc | Ayrshire, IA 50515 | $66,462 |
14 | Fred Roland Wirtz Jr | West Bend, IA 50597 | $57,053 |
15 | Darrel D Berkland | Fenton, IA 50539 | $56,587 |
16 | Williamson Brothers Inc | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $50,010 |
17 | N40 Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $47,674 |
18 | Dna Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $47,674 |
19 | Girres Ag Inc | West Bend, IA 50597 | $42,900 |
20 | S J Brownlee Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $42,889 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>