Farm Subsidy information
Pottawattamie County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Pottawattamie County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,694
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pottawattamie County, Iowa totaled $386,501,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Milton Wayne Boll | Walnut, IA 51577 | $852,503 |
42 | Dean A Kock | Hancock, IA 51536 | $826,941 |
43 | B W Armm Inc | Hancock, IA 51536 | $826,647 |
44 | Scotch Hills Inc | Walnut, IA 51577 | $825,433 |
45 | Hering Farms Inc | Oakland, IA 51560 | $782,551 |
46 | Mark Beedle | Oakland, IA 51560 | $770,503 |
47 | Duane A Nielsen | Avoca, IA 51521 | $766,298 |
48 | Dale J Kardell | Avoca, IA 51521 | $737,035 |
49 | Daniel Jay Feigenbutz | Oakland, IA 51560 | $714,963 |
50 | Roy & Janice Schultz Rev Trust | Avoca, IA 51521 | $710,624 |
51 | Wade G Amos | Griswold, IA 51535 | $708,151 |
52 | Fred J Matters Rev Trust | Ankeny, IA 50021 | $706,982 |
53 | Nomad Acres Inc | Oakland, IA 51560 | $705,244 |
54 | Whiley Grain Farms Inc | Griswold, IA 51535 | $702,458 |
55 | Paul Dean Gehrmann | Carson, IA 51525 | $686,808 |
56 | David W Bierbaum | Atlantic, IA 50022 | $684,340 |
57 | Aaron A Vorthmann | Henderson, IA 51541 | $677,439 |
58 | Dwight J Hobson | Oakland, IA 51560 | $676,102 |
59 | Dale Edward Schroder | Avoca, IA 51521 | $672,248 |
60 | G Cross Land And Livestock Inc | Oakland, IA 51560 | $671,907 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”