Farm Subsidy information
Sac County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Sac County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,435
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sac County, Iowa totaled $456,030,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Era Partnership | Sac City, IA 50583 | $3,991,691 |
| 2 | Johnson Brothers | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $2,901,546 |
| 3 | Cranston Bros Joint Venture | Ida Grove, IA 51445 | $2,192,340 |
| 4 | Reik Bros | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $2,161,297 |
| 5 | Peyton Inc | Sac City, IA 50583 | $2,062,934 |
| 6 | Craig Allen Aschinger | Wall Lake, IA 51466 | $1,768,087 |
| 7 | Sfi Inc | Nemaha, IA 50567 | $1,738,504 |
| 8 | Gary & Keith Siebrecht Ptn | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $1,728,200 |
| 9 | Steven J Renze | Auburn, IA 51433 | $1,649,665 |
| 10 | Quirk Farms Inc | Odebolt, IA 51458 | $1,634,144 |
| 11 | Sanders Farm Inc | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,616,907 |
| 12 | Ziegmann Bros | Wall Lake, IA 51466 | $1,591,731 |
| 13 | Loren L Movall | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $1,524,108 |
| 14 | Benjamin Renze | Lake View, IA 51450 | $1,522,345 |
| 15 | Lynn Dean Garrels | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,515,680 |
| 16 | John William Geake | Wall Lake, IA 51466 | $1,463,232 |
| 17 | Tripp Brothers | Schaller, IA 51053 | $1,439,799 |
| 18 | John F Renze | Auburn, IA 51433 | $1,432,938 |
| 19 | Rick & Evan Hecht Farm Ptn | Sac City, IA 50583 | $1,380,530 |
| 20 | Auburn Farms Inc | Auburn, IA 51433 | $1,380,373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf