Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Story County, Iowa, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 746
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Story County, Iowa totaled $4,589,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Longview Farms | Nevada, IA 50201 | $80,860 |
| 2 | Eric Ivan Jensen | Nevada, IA 50201 | $58,285 |
| 3 | Ritland Farms Inc | Roland, IA 50236 | $43,315 |
| 4 | Andrew James Swanson | Nevada, IA 50201 | $40,576 |
| 5 | Greenfield Farms Inc | Nevada, IA 50201 | $39,831 |
| 6 | Michael Howard Hofer | Collins, IA 50055 | $34,767 |
| 7 | W C Partnership | Story City, IA 50248 | $34,070 |
| 8 | Luzviminda Swanson | Nevada, IA 50201 | $33,872 |
| 9 | Gerlach Farms Inc | Nevada, IA 50201 | $32,035 |
| 10 | Dale Richard Swanson | Nevada, IA 50201 | $31,396 |
| 11 | Evergreen Lane Inc | Nevada, IA 50201 | $31,393 |
| 12 | Beau Michael Romsey | Gilbert, IA 50105 | $31,113 |
| 13 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $30,733 |
| 14 | Smithchilds Inc | Ames, IA 50010 | $30,552 |
| 15 | Steven Douglas Forth | Ames, IA 50014 | $28,712 |
| 16 | Michael Steven Wright | Nevada, IA 50201 | $28,625 |
| 17 | Rachael Lynn Swanson | Nevada, IA 50201 | $28,585 |
| 18 | Seth W Upchurch | Colo, IA 50056 | $28,414 |
| 19 | Rusby LLC | Story City, IA 50248 | $28,241 |
| 20 | Committee For Agricultural Development | Ames, IA 50011 | $27,472 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf