Conservation Reserve Program in Barber County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 71
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Barber County, Kansas totaled $222,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charlaine Baskett | Casper, WY 82604 | $3,850 |
22 | Harold D Kruckenberg Rev Tr | Douglass, KS 67039 | $3,762 |
23 | James W Mcguire | Amarillo, TX 79109 | $3,756 |
24 | Jack L & Paula M Marteney Rev Liv | Kiowa, KS 67070 | $3,066 |
25 | Dovie Martin | Isabel, KS 67065 | $2,668 |
26 | Michael E Wesley | Lake City, KS 67071 | $2,530 |
27 | Joan White | Ames, IA 50014 | $2,530 |
28 | Jerry C Dudley | Topeka, KS 66619 | $2,438 |
29 | Bruce E Rickard Trust Dated March 7, 2013-bruce E | Nashville, KS 67112 | $2,314 |
30 | Craig A Mease Revocable Trust | Nashville, KS 67112 | $2,314 |
31 | S-bar LLC | Woodruff, SC 29388 | $2,157 |
32 | Marilyn Hansen | Dallas, TX 75214 | $2,144 |
33 | Lawrence Meredith And Patricia L. Meredith Family | Stockton, CA 95209 | $2,144 |
34 | Shirley J. Miller Living Trust | Richland, WA 99354 | $2,144 |
35 | Charles F Heydenreich II | Crawfordville, FL 32327 | $2,038 |
36 | Caren J Bennefield | Ray City, GA 31645 | $2,038 |
37 | Elizabeth Conners Boyd Revocable Trust | Halstead, KS 67056 | $2,017 |
38 | William D Bell | Medicine Lodge, KS 67104 | $1,925 |
39 | Randall D Watkins | Derby, KS 67037 | $1,878 |
40 | Pamela Gottsponer | Houston, TX 77056 | $1,878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”