Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Bourbon County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 72
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Bourbon County, Kansas totaled $58,844 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | George -- George M W M Warren | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $5,080 |
2 | Richard H Perry Revocable Trust | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $4,411 |
3 | Calvin Cobb | Walnut, KS 66780 | $3,989 |
4 | Thomas Lynn Collins | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $3,542 |
5 | Phillip R Wimmer | Fulton, KS 66738 | $3,351 |
6 | Wayne Bolinger | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $2,528 |
7 | George Holt & Esther Holt Revocable Trust | Uniontown, KS 66779 | $2,410 |
8 | Larry L Howard | Arcadia, KS 66711 | $2,352 |
9 | Charles D Sinn | Eureka, IL 61530 | $2,333 |
10 | Matt Brooks | Hume, MO 64752 | $2,113 |
11 | Robert L Collins | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $2,056 |
12 | Lewis Williams Revocable Trust Dt | Redfield, KS 66769 | $2,031 |
13 | George Leroy Fuhrman | Moran, KS 66755 | $1,831 |
14 | David Myers | Bronson, KS 66716 | $1,677 |
15 | R Keith Daniels | Redfield, KS 66769 | $1,629 |
16 | Ed Judy | Redfield, KS 66769 | $1,144 |
17 | Loren D Lance | Bronson, KS 66716 | $1,069 |
18 | Charles M Blevins | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $1,066 |
19 | David Wade | Mapleton, KS 66754 | $1,037 |
20 | Kenneth Hammar | Fort Scott, KS 66701 | $958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>