Total Commodity Programs in Chase County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 226
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $2,409,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Joe E Heathman | Matfield Grn, KS 66862 | $33,346 |
22 | Michael A Harris | Strong City, KS 66869 | $32,752 |
23 | Charles A Pilgrim Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $30,823 |
24 | Tom Sollner | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $29,034 |
25 | Donnie R Swift | Matfield Green, KS 66862 | $25,383 |
26 | Juanita Starkey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $21,238 |
27 | Eric Sigel | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $20,675 |
28 | Charles Tom Jones | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $19,152 |
29 | Timothy Donahue-timothy Patrick D | Lincolnville, KS 66858 | $17,687 |
30 | Burkhart Heathman Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $16,669 |
31 | Neal Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $15,631 |
32 | Hendrika Vos | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $15,500 |
33 | Virginia M Peterson Rev Trust Dated May 10, 2013 | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $14,902 |
34 | Randal Peterson | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $14,580 |
35 | Pioneer Ranch Lc | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $14,464 |
36 | Larry Lind | Conroe, TX 77303 | $14,187 |
37 | Donald C Immasche Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $14,110 |
38 | Joseph F Sigel | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $14,026 |
39 | Beef Productions Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $12,370 |
40 | Gary D Bruch | Strong City, KS 66869 | $12,232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”