Farm Subsidy information
Chautauqua County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Chautauqua County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 847
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chautauqua County, Kansas totaled $28,666,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frank Adcock | Sedan, KS 67361 | $197,043 |
22 | James W Bell | Moline, KS 67353 | $188,885 |
23 | Dean M Wolfe | Elk City, KS 67344 | $185,881 |
24 | Shaun - Leatherneck Cattle Company LLC Christopher | Sedan, KS 67361 | $181,657 |
25 | William G Sproul | Sedan, KS 67361 | $180,523 |
26 | John G Kelley | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $178,117 |
27 | The Rinck River Bottom Farms Inc | Peru, KS 67360 | $174,683 |
28 | Ccc Farms Inc | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $168,214 |
29 | Robert J Folk | S Coffeyville, OK 74072 | $156,461 |
30 | Earl Kelly | Grenola, KS 67346 | $156,412 |
31 | Diamond Bar D Ranch LLC | Tulsa, OK 74136 | $149,532 |
32 | Stanley David Scott | Caney, KS 67333 | $143,288 |
33 | Donald Jackson | Sedan, KS 67361 | $142,864 |
34 | Gary A Kelley | Sedan, KS 67361 | $139,068 |
35 | Dennis R Mcnee | Moline, KS 67353 | $138,636 |
36 | Ronald L Rogers Revocable Trust | Cedar Vale, KS 67024 | $138,063 |
37 | Coffey Bros | Okarche, OK 73762 | $136,864 |
38 | Bonnie Darbro | Longton, KS 67352 | $135,717 |
39 | Daniel Fogarty | Niotaze, KS 67355 | $130,554 |
40 | Lazy K Cattle Company LLC | Edmond, OK 73013 | $128,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”