Farm Subsidy information
Cheyenne County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,893
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $336,671,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4-c's Partnership | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $4,427,152 |
| 2 | Hendricks Bros Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $3,139,614 |
| 3 | Wt Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $2,174,754 |
| 4 | Bankwest ** | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,109,902 |
| 5 | Sunny Crest Farm | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,917,159 |
| 6 | Fairview Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,820,778 |
| 7 | Albert Keller Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,765,514 |
| 8 | Walden Farms | Bird City, KS 67731 | $1,645,417 |
| 9 | Douthit Brothers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,597,975 |
| 10 | Michael -michael L Rogers Rev Lvg Trust- L Rogers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,548,790 |
| 11 | Daniel - D & L Busse Family Trust - P Busse | Bird City, KS 67731 | $1,547,514 |
| 12 | Jonathan B Waters | Bird City, KS 67731 | $1,547,103 |
| 13 | Cory D Busse | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,545,812 |
| 14 | Kent & Joan Banister Partnership | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,531,901 |
| 15 | Jo Anne Rogers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,458,007 |
| 16 | Smith Farms | Bird City, KS 67731 | $1,446,374 |
| 17 | M John Keller Family Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,413,425 |
| 18 | Perry Keller | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,406,156 |
| 19 | Daniel Stephens | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,321,954 |
| 20 | Donna E Zweygardt Rev Lvg Trust | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $1,297,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf