Total Commodity Programs in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,596

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $170,784,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
14-c's PartnershipSaint Francis, KS 67756$3,369,294
2Hendricks Bros PartnershipBird City, KS 67731$3,130,702
3Bankwest **Saint Francis, KS 67756$2,029,076
4Wt PartnershipBird City, KS 67731$1,956,668
5Sunny Crest FarmSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,703,833
6Walden FarmsBird City, KS 67731$1,450,480
7Kent & Joan Banister PartnershipMc Donald, KS 67745$1,431,255
8Fairview Farms IncSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,394,469
9Michael -michael L Rogers Rev Lvg Trust- L RogersSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,367,569
10Jonathan B WatersBird City, KS 67731$1,359,421
11Jo Anne RogersSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,287,140
12Smith FarmsBird City, KS 67731$1,274,739
13Albert Keller Farms IncSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,236,506
14Daniel StephensSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,168,655
15R Joe KramerBrewster, KS 67732$1,164,235
16Douthit BrothersSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,088,159
17Rita StephensSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,078,090
18Daran Todd NeitzelSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,074,727
19M John Keller Family Farms IncSaint Francis, KS 67756$1,047,885
20Gary S BrubakerBird City, KS 67731$1,027,775

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag