Conservation Reserve Program in Clay County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 306
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clay County, Kansas totaled $781,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jay Michael Mall | Leonardville, KS 66449 | $7,998 |
22 | Otter Creek Farms LLC | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $7,688 |
23 | C Larry Fear | Wichita, KS 67203 | $7,584 |
24 | Susan K Bebermeyer | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $7,526 |
25 | Leroy Bartley | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $7,260 |
26 | Jean Baker | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $7,222 |
27 | David A Schoneweis Trust-2018 | Arlington, TX 76017 | $6,776 |
28 | Shirley M Riek | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $6,516 |
29 | Bryan Evans | Green, KS 67447 | $6,430 |
30 | Thomas I Gilbert Rev Trust | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $6,374 |
31 | Michael Miller | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $6,306 |
32 | Wanda Hafner-wayne & Wanda Hafner Family Tr 2017 | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $6,241 |
33 | Crossview Properties, LLC | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $6,228 |
34 | Nedwin G Sump | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $6,085 |
35 | Donald F Doberer Tr Dated 9-13-19 | Mission, TX 78574 | $5,834 |
36 | Jason Yarrow | Wakefield, KS 67487 | $5,769 |
37 | Dennis J Brady | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $5,619 |
38 | Boyd Arvin & Joan K Randle Rev Liv Trust Dated Apr | Morganville, KS 67468 | $5,514 |
39 | Cott Family Farms | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $5,492 |
40 | Mary Ann Martin | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $5,339 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”