Production Flexibility Program in Douglas County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,171
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Douglas County, Kansas totaled $7,300,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nunemaker-ross Inc | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $159,968 |
2 | Pine Family Farms Gen Ptn | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $153,024 |
3 | Pine Family Farms | Lawrence, KS 66044 | $118,448 |
4 | Richard L Knabe Rev Trust | Eudora, KS 66025 | $116,858 |
5 | Carl E Flory Rev Trust | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $115,211 |
6 | Triple B Farms | Lawrence, KS 66049 | $114,432 |
7 | Guenther Bros Partnership | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $113,059 |
8 | Robert W Gabriel Sr | Eudora, KS 66025 | $111,526 |
9 | Rocking H Ranch Inc | Berryton, KS 66409 | $105,097 |
10 | Lone Pine Acres Inc | Lecompton, KS 66050 | $94,786 |
11 | James Wiscombe | Overbrook, KS 66524 | $93,551 |
12 | Hagerman-craig Farms Inc | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $92,287 |
13 | Metsker Farms | Lawrence, KS 66047 | $92,000 |
14 | Kermit Kalb Rev Tr | Wellsville, KS 66092 | $90,898 |
15 | Ralph D Kitsmiller Rev Tr | Lawrence, KS 66046 | $89,049 |
16 | Roger Kitsmiller Rev Tr-roger Kitsmiller | Lawrence, KS 66046 | $89,047 |
17 | Neis Brothers Ptn | Eudora, KS 66025 | $83,261 |
18 | Schaake Farms Inc | Lawrence, KS 66046 | $78,976 |
19 | Mark Neis | Eudora, KS 66025 | $71,978 |
20 | Michael John Wintermantel | Baldwin City, KS 66006 | $67,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>