Counter Cyclical Program in Greeley County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 737
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Greeley County, Kansas totaled $2,620,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Horizon Farms Inc | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $87,420 |
2 | Western Feeders Inc | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $76,265 |
3 | Sidney Farms LLC | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $75,758 |
4 | Mark Cavenee Farms Jv | Tribune, KS 67879 | $75,022 |
5 | Verdell Young & Son | Tribune, KS 67879 | $73,746 |
6 | Gary L Allen Tr No 1 | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $73,499 |
7 | K & K Farming Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $72,271 |
8 | A - Bradford Smith R Bradford Smi | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $69,171 |
9 | G-k Feeders Inc | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $68,767 |
10 | Wheatbelt Farms Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $62,769 |
11 | Sunburst Farms Partnership | Tribune, KS 67879 | $61,890 |
12 | Peter Farms | Tribune, KS 67879 | $59,808 |
13 | Plains Feeders Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $57,568 |
14 | Gateway Farms LLC | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $50,761 |
15 | Cabernet LLC | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $47,792 |
16 | Nickelson Farms Inc | Weskan, KS 67762 | $43,315 |
17 | Chalk Creek Farms LLC | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $42,661 |
18 | Mark E Smith | Wallace, KS 67761 | $38,782 |
19 | Joe - Smith Trust No E Smith | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $37,215 |
20 | Thomas W Bergner | Tribune, KS 67879 | $36,765 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>