Farm Subsidy information
Nemaha County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Nemaha County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,209
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nemaha County, Kansas totaled $48,790,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J-six Farms LLC | Seneca, KS 66538 | $1,524,222 |
2 | Haverkamp Bros Inc | Seneca, KS 66538 | $1,339,250 |
3 | Hartter Brothers Pork, LLC | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $983,607 |
4 | Kelly Hills Dairy Inc | Seneca, KS 66538 | $679,642 |
5 | Timberview Farms | Bern, KS 66408 | $655,673 |
6 | Steven L Macke | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $510,019 |
7 | Jr Feeders Inc | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $500,401 |
8 | Roger J Macke | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $487,096 |
9 | Burdiek Cattle LLC | Wetmore, KS 66550 | $420,771 |
10 | Corey M Bloom | Wetmore, KS 66550 | $418,480 |
11 | J & J Hermesch Partnership | Goff, KS 66428 | $417,810 |
12 | David Enneking | Centralia, KS 66415 | $403,192 |
13 | Stallbaumer Cattle Feeders Inc | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $367,173 |
14 | Scott D Deters | Corning, KS 66417 | $335,630 |
15 | Holthaus Brothers LLC | Centralia, KS 66415 | $326,246 |
16 | Rottinghaus Holstein Fm Inc | Seneca, KS 66538 | $316,917 |
17 | Bryce Kohake Inc | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $268,317 |
18 | Seneca Milk Company LLC | Seneca, KS 66538 | $265,952 |
19 | Lone Pine Cattle Co | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $260,166 |
20 | Stephen & Lee Ukele Ptr Clover Leaf Farms | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $239,727 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>