Direct Payment Program in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,384
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Pottawatomie County, Kansas totaled $17,787,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | White Bros Land & Livestock | Belvue, KS 66407 | $567,159 |
2 | Peterson Feedlot Partnership | Wamego, KS 66547 | $474,498 |
3 | Pessemier Co Inc | Saint Marys, KS 66536 | $426,997 |
4 | Peddicord Land & Cattle Co Inc | Wamego, KS 66547 | $400,611 |
5 | Miller Feedlot Inc | Wamego, KS 66547 | $389,072 |
6 | Rezac Land And Livestock Inc | Onaga, KS 66521 | $371,384 |
7 | R & R Suther Farms | Westmoreland, KS 66549 | $308,661 |
8 | William A Boyce | Wamego, KS 66547 | $251,509 |
9 | Wickstrum Farms Inc | Westmoreland, KS 66549 | $243,950 |
10 | George J Hieger | Wamego, KS 66547 | $201,818 |
11 | Duncan Farms LLC | Westmoreland, KS 66549 | $197,933 |
12 | Umscheid Farms LLC | Saint George, KS 66535 | $197,042 |
13 | Thomas L Ebert Rev Trust | Saint George, KS 66535 | $169,576 |
14 | Jimmy D & Sharen K Tessendorf Rev Trust | Wamego, KS 66547 | $167,502 |
15 | Carnahan Farms | Wamego, KS 66547 | $159,342 |
16 | Justin D Boswell | Onaga, KS 66521 | $157,858 |
17 | Ronnau Farms Inc | Saint Marys, KS 66536 | $148,866 |
18 | Dale E Northup | Wamego, KS 66547 | $141,715 |
19 | William J Baumchen | Emmett, KS 66422 | $134,255 |
20 | Gbn Farms LLC | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $126,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>