Farm Subsidy information

Rooks County, Kansas

Total Subsidies in Rooks County, Kansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,191

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rooks County, Kansas totaled $254,314,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Timothy J Berland Trust No 1Damar, KS 67632$2,491,245
2Riffel Farms IncStockton, KS 67669$2,117,694
3Jerry Mcreynolds-jerry C Mcreynolds Trust No 1Woodston, KS 67675$2,054,694
4Dwight T SchneiderStockton, KS 67669$1,830,048
5Douglas KeasPlainville, KS 67663$1,689,324
6Lambert Living TrustZurich, KS 67663$1,629,301
7R Alan- Alan & Corrine Dix Living Trust DixStockton, KS 67669$1,629,017
8Donald E Lucky Living TrustStockton, KS 67669$1,591,429
9Robert J RostocilPlainville, KS 67663$1,565,527
10Saindon Farms LLCZurich, KS 67663$1,538,655
11Robert D Dix Rev TrustWoodston, KS 67675$1,334,136
12Larry Lala - Larry & Elizabeth Lala Family TrKirwin, KS 67644$1,323,786
13Leo Oliva Rev TrustWoodston, KS 67675$1,303,802
14Bruce M Hachmeister Rev TrustNatoma, KS 67651$1,211,527
15Verl MuirStockton, KS 67669$1,191,947
16Kenneth E RiffeStockton, KS 67669$1,191,494
17Hance Cattle CoStockton, KS 67669$1,153,710
18Niblock Living TrustStockton, KS 67669$1,141,377
19Allphin Family Trust No 1Zurich, KS 67663$1,102,896
20Tim BenoitDamar, KS 67632$1,101,311

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag