Total Conservation Programs in Saline County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 218
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saline County, Kansas totaled $422,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walle Bros Inc | Culver, KS 67484 | $30,636 |
2 | Adley E Johnson Trust No 1 | Salina, KS 67401 | $15,027 |
3 | Robert E Garrison Irrevocable Tru | Salina, KS 67401 | $14,110 |
4 | Laas Farms Inc | Brookville, KS 67425 | $11,260 |
5 | Luis Alfredo Lopez | Salina, KS 67401 | $10,821 |
6 | William C Hoffman Revocable Trust | Salina, KS 67402 | $7,835 |
7 | Marjorie E Streckfus Revocable Trust | Bridgeport, CT 06606 | $7,662 |
8 | Carl Redden | Gypsum, KS 67448 | $7,492 |
9 | Gary L Hammond Revocable Trust | Assaria, KS 67416 | $6,688 |
10 | Harbin Family Part Lp | Salina, KS 67401 | $6,328 |
11 | Michael Laron Karber Revocable Inter Vivos Trust | Gypsum, KS 67448 | $5,964 |
12 | John W Hahn | Fort Collins, CO 80525 | $5,964 |
13 | David R Samuelson | Falun, KS 67442 | $5,451 |
14 | Brenda L Hemmer Revocable Trust | Lindsborg, KS 67456 | $5,403 |
15 | Ralph B Finkle | Fulton, TX 78358 | $5,398 |
16 | Michael S Kopf | Wichita, KS 67205 | $5,187 |
17 | Ermal D Nelson | Lindsborg, KS 67456 | $5,173 |
18 | Duane & Judith Thiel Family Revocable Trust | Lindsborg, KS 67456 | $5,170 |
19 | Frank H Griffith Trust No 1 | Salina, KS 67401 | $4,666 |
20 | Lyle Swisher | Lindsborg, KS 67456 | $4,649 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>