Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 254
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $429,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K-d Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $57,948 |
| 2 | C & S Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $15,769 |
| 3 | Wide Horizons | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $12,765 |
| 4 | Wilkens Inc | Gt Barrington, MA 01230 | $11,766 |
| 5 | Hlm Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $9,601 |
| 6 | Jack Dale Frick | Lakeland, FL 33813 | $8,991 |
| 7 | Steven D Compton | Scott City, KS 67871 | $8,554 |
| 8 | Gary Janssen Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $8,506 |
| 9 | Herbert A Stevens Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $8,254 |
| 10 | Roger E Kohman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $7,508 |
| 11 | William J Savolt | Garden City, KS 67846 | $7,375 |
| 12 | Robert Harkness Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $7,206 |
| 13 | Crist Grain & Cattle Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $7,045 |
| 14 | Dallas Savolt | Garden City, KS 67846 | $6,971 |
| 15 | Circle C Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $6,934 |
| 16 | Robert And Donna Eitel Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $6,861 |
| 17 | Donna S Eitel | Scott City, KS 67871 | $6,860 |
| 18 | C Laylene Janssen Trust No 1 | Scott City, KS 67871 | $6,658 |
| 19 | Janssen Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $6,245 |
| 20 | Savolts Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $5,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf