Farm Subsidy information
Wilson County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Wilson County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wilson County, Kansas totaled $14,815,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michelle Haun | Fall River, KS 67047 | $357,200 |
| 2 | Brad A Haun | Fall River, KS 67047 | $357,168 |
| 3 | Casey D Kimberlin | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $258,034 |
| 4 | Cecil D Haun | Fall River, KS 67047 | $249,094 |
| 5 | Timmons Bros. Farms, LLC | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $216,954 |
| 6 | Earl Porter | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $210,513 |
| 7 | Wildcat Farms Of Altoona Inc | Altoona, KS 66710 | $207,412 |
| 8 | Chester Hobbs | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $199,373 |
| 9 | Kc Farms Inc | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $197,983 |
| 10 | William Devin Baker | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $184,581 |
| 11 | Raebern And Deadra Nelson Lvg Trust | Chanute, KS 66720 | $179,512 |
| 12 | David D Marple | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $158,745 |
| 13 | Heritage Farms Of Kansas LLC | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $156,743 |
| 14 | Debbie Bradford | Chanute, KS 66720 | $148,923 |
| 15 | Holst Land & Cattle Company LLC | Thayer, KS 66776 | $139,003 |
| 16 | Mr Jack W Kebert | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $134,069 |
| 17 | Steve Huser | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $129,856 |
| 18 | Evan Thomas Porter | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $124,868 |
| 19 | Bradford Grain Co Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $121,375 |
| 20 | Millertime Farms Inc | Benedict, KS 66714 | $117,775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf