Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $37,685 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michael Allen Havens | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $10,131 |
2 | Ireton Farms | New Richmond, OH 45157 | $7,799 |
3 | Michael O Murphy | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $4,084 |
4 | Keaton S Mccarty | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,535 |
5 | Christian M Mccarty | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,438 |
6 | Timothy A Triplett | Salt Lick, KY 40371 | $1,319 |
7 | William C Reffitt | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,058 |
8 | Robert H Amburgey Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $796 |
9 | Gary Forrest Bowen | Stanton, KY 40380 | $792 |
10 | James Berkley Mark | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $767 |
11 | Lonnie Dale Anderson Jr | Stanton, KY 40380 | $716 |
12 | Luciana L Alderman | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $656 |
13 | Aaron Marsee | Stanton, KY 40380 | $451 |
14 | Donald R Oney | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $404 |
15 | Dudley Brent Wilson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $391 |
16 | Charles Triplett | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $391 |
17 | Marvin R Tabor | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $376 |
18 | Barry T Mccoy | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $247 |
19 | James Shipp | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $188 |
20 | Winston Hamilton | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $76 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>