Farm Subsidy information
Muhlenberg County, Kentucky
Total Subsidies in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 369
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky totaled $6,132,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Double S Farms | Greenville, KY 42345 | $581,925 |
2 | Hidden Valley Farms | Sacramento, KY 42372 | $427,512 |
3 | Isome Sapp | Greenville, KY 42345 | $255,167 |
4 | Mark Pogue Dba Pogue Farms | Greenville, KY 42345 | $220,101 |
5 | Nathan C Lovell | Greenville, KY 42345 | $152,235 |
6 | Cypress Creek Farms | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $131,169 |
7 | Timothy R Cooke | Drakesboro, KY 42337 | $120,458 |
8 | Logan S Slinker | Greenville, KY 42345 | $98,830 |
9 | Lost Valley Farm | Bremen, KY 42325 | $96,748 |
10 | Bastin Enterprises Inc | Central City, KY 42330 | $93,925 |
11 | Petrie Farms LLC | Greenville, KY 42345 | $90,975 |
12 | Gatton Valley View Farms LLC | Bremen, KY 42325 | $89,482 |
13 | Robert Dale Marx | White Plains, KY 42464 | $88,314 |
14 | Hardison-sapp Farms | Greenville, KY 42345 | $78,520 |
15 | Kala Michell Ford | Greenville, KY 42345 | $70,184 |
16 | Timothy Joe Hendricks | Sacramento, KY 42372 | $67,078 |
17 | Charles M Skaggs | Elkton, KY 42220 | $65,563 |
18 | Matthew Taylor Skaggs | Greenville, KY 42345 | $62,944 |
19 | William Shane Kirkpatrick | Central City, KY 42330 | $56,949 |
20 | Payton D Bullock | Sacramento, KY 42372 | $56,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>