Market Loss Assistance Program in Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 31,872
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Louisiana totaled $468,836,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Elm Tree Planting Co | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $640,060 |
22 | F & W Farms | Crowley, LA 70526 | $639,303 |
23 | Stutts Farms | Bonita, LA 71223 | $594,976 |
24 | Rp7 Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $594,696 |
25 | Morrison Ventures | Salina, KS 67402 | $575,273 |
26 | P & S Farms | Newellton, LA 71357 | $569,444 |
27 | Ed Wild & Sons Partnership | Welsh, LA 70591 | $553,549 |
28 | Michael Brown & Sons | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $548,424 |
29 | North Boeuf Farms Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $538,176 |
30 | Crook Planting Co | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $534,814 |
31 | Wild Farms | Midland, LA 70559 | $533,283 |
32 | Patrick Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $532,236 |
33 | Wilkerson Farms II | Newellton, LA 71357 | $522,504 |
34 | Ramco Rice Co | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $522,500 |
35 | A & B Partnership | Jones, LA 71250 | $521,318 |
36 | Ewell Hebert & Sons | Abbeville, LA 70510 | $520,367 |
37 | C & F Farms Partnership | Palmetto, LA 71358 | $518,896 |
38 | Jordan Planting Co II | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $513,096 |
39 | Frierson Plantation | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $511,569 |
40 | Parker Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $511,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”