Farm Subsidy information
Caddo Parish, Louisiana
Total Subsidies in Caddo Parish, Louisiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 102
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caddo Parish, Louisiana totaled $5,472,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Logan Farms Partnership | Gilliam, LA 71029 | $781,664 |
| 2 | Uni Plantation | Belcher, LA 71004 | $323,210 |
| 3 | Bruce Newton Lynn III | Belcher, LA 71004 | $289,539 |
| 4 | Bruce N Lynn Jr | Gilliam, LA 71029 | $244,625 |
| 5 | Volentine Farms Ptnship | Shreveport, LA 71107 | $205,466 |
| 6 | Chicot Bend Plantation | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $194,708 |
| 7 | Dominick Farms | Mira, LA 71044 | $189,452 |
| 8 | Chris Dominick & Son | Mira, LA 71044 | $181,559 |
| 9 | Broken R LLC | Benton, LA 71006 | $156,620 |
| 10 | D&d Partnership | Bossier City, LA 71111 | $134,452 |
| 11 | Rmw Farms | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $120,169 |
| 12 | C B Frierson Farm LLC | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $119,840 |
| 13 | Douglas J Crain | Belcher, LA 71004 | $115,609 |
| 14 | Grant Nickel | Bradley, AR 71826 | $98,764 |
| 15 | Marvis R Grisham | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $82,608 |
| 16 | Danny D Grisham | Plain Dealing, LA 71064 | $82,608 |
| 17 | Patrick M Blount | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $81,388 |
| 18 | Kyle B Dominick | Ida, LA 71044 | $81,380 |
| 19 | Longmeadow Farms | Shreveport, LA 71115 | $72,023 |
| 20 | Stinson Farms | Belcher, LA 71004 | $68,673 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf