Farm Subsidy information
Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana
Total Subsidies in Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,345
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana totaled $164,711,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J & C Matt Partnership | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $6,895,667 |
2 | Methvin Farms | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $6,325,808 |
3 | Puckett Farms | Natchez, LA 71456 | $4,620,342 |
4 | Russell & Mary Edith Stacy Farm | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $3,459,171 |
5 | Bayou Camitte Plantation | Cloutierville, LA 71416 | $2,828,822 |
6 | North Boeuf Farms Partnership | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $2,763,463 |
7 | King Hill Farm Partnership | Coushatta, LA 71019 | $2,406,035 |
8 | J R Land & Cattle Partnership | Elgin, TX 78621 | $2,353,943 |
9 | Ronnie & Darlene Blewer Farms | Campti, LA 71411 | $2,325,965 |
10 | Bunch & Dencker Farms Partnership | Monroe, LA 71211 | $2,267,265 |
11 | Elm Tree Planting Co | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $2,025,343 |
12 | Friedman Farms | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $1,890,334 |
13 | W & R Farming Partnership | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $1,734,099 |
14 | Glory Island Farming Partnership | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $1,697,262 |
15 | Est Of J C Carnahan | Cloutierville, LA 71416 | $1,543,704 |
16 | Philen Farm Partnership | Natchez, LA 71456 | $1,493,888 |
17 | Rayburn Smith | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $1,422,862 |
18 | J & J Farming A Partnership | Natchez, LA 71456 | $1,391,158 |
19 | K&b Farming Partnership | Robeline, LA 71469 | $1,376,727 |
20 | Three League Partnership | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $1,367,691 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>