Direct Payment Program in Tensas Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 221 to 240 of 985
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Tensas Parish, Louisiana totaled $72,283,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
221 | Richland Plantation LLC | Monroe, LA 71201 | $46,300 |
222 | Lavadas Crops Partnership | Delhi, LA 71232 | $46,214 |
223 | Locustland Pltn | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $46,169 |
224 | William G Ragsdale | Newellton, LA 71357 | $46,077 |
225 | Janet M Ragsdale | Newellton, LA 71357 | $46,077 |
226 | Billa Faye Smith | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $45,204 |
227 | Gurtna Mora | Canton, MS 39046 | $44,470 |
228 | Adam Clark | Jigger, LA 71249 | $44,330 |
229 | Amy Clark | Jigger, LA 71249 | $43,830 |
230 | James F Bunch Jr | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $43,668 |
231 | Jerry Bottley | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $43,460 |
232 | Christopher Butler | Waterproof, LA 71375 | $43,435 |
233 | Melodie Meyers | Jonesville, LA 71343 | $42,944 |
234 | Christy Lee | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $42,625 |
235 | James Matthews | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $41,709 |
236 | Jennifer Sikes | Newellton, LA 71357 | $41,709 |
237 | Hays Farm | Natchez, MS 39120 | $41,650 |
238 | Linda C Gasaway | West Monroe, LA 71292 | $41,625 |
239 | Lancaster Planting Co LLC | Clayton, LA 71326 | $41,191 |
240 | Dickerson Agricultural Partnershi | Delhi, LA 71232 | $41,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”