Conservation Reserve Program in Maryland, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,304
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Maryland totaled $10,518,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wood Brothers | Centreville, MD 21617 | $72,696 |
2 | Anne R Windsor | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $50,000 |
3 | Springfield Farms Inc | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $50,000 |
4 | Price Valley Farm LLC | Warwick, MD 21912 | $50,000 |
5 | Derby Farm Inc | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $50,000 |
6 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $50,000 |
7 | Emma Elizabeth Rickards Irrevocable Trust | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $50,000 |
8 | Marshall Seafood & Farming Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $49,962 |
9 | William H Cooper Jr | Eden, MD 21822 | $49,894 |
10 | Dickinson Brothers | Linkwood, MD 21835 | $49,842 |
11 | Curtis Eberspacher | Cornelius, NC 28031 | $49,796 |
12 | Hollywood Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $46,697 |
13 | Chesapeake Wildlife Heritage | Chester, MD 21619 | $46,567 |
14 | Oldfield Farms Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $46,429 |
15 | Emily Jean Taylor | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $45,915 |
16 | Estate Of Carolyn C Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $45,243 |
17 | Anneliese Morris | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $45,185 |
18 | James A Calderwood | Chevy Chase, MD 20815 | $44,585 |
19 | James E Baker | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $44,331 |
20 | Kings Grant Farm Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $43,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>