Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Maryland, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,761
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Maryland totaled $72,148,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $259,938 |
22 | Lease Brothers Inc | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $258,388 |
23 | Keith Edward Mercer | Frederick, MD 21701 | $254,754 |
24 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $250,000 |
25 | Hutchison Bros | Cordova, MD 21625 | $247,542 |
26 | Shellcross Farms LLC | Centreville, MD 21617 | $246,115 |
27 | Charles T Jamison | Dickerson, MD 20842 | $244,302 |
28 | Clearview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $243,247 |
29 | Jonathan C Quinn | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $241,129 |
30 | Neal Farms Partnership | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $238,947 |
31 | Edward P Appenzeller Jr | Millington, MD 21651 | $234,853 |
32 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $231,945 |
33 | Temple C Rhodes | Centreville, MD 21617 | $228,297 |
34 | Stephen E Beckley | Sharpsburg, MD 21782 | $226,359 |
35 | Wimberly Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $226,303 |
36 | David Good | Greensboro, MD 21639 | $222,303 |
37 | C E Gingrich & Son LLC | Gaithersburg, MD 20882 | $220,114 |
38 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $217,704 |
39 | William M Knight Jr | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $214,975 |
40 | Garrett Bros LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $214,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”