Production Flexibility Program in Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,510
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Maryland totaled $99,370,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pleasant Valley Farm Partnership Llp | Brookeville, MD 20833 | $561,608 |
2 | Pcn Farms Llp | Easton, MD 21601 | $459,376 |
3 | Rutkoske Farms | Middletown, DE 19709 | $423,585 |
4 | Hunt Ray Farms | Centreville, MD 21617 | $395,048 |
5 | 4m's Farm LLC | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $385,474 |
6 | Hutchison Bros | Cordova, MD 21625 | $372,660 |
7 | J D Farms | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $328,122 |
8 | Clearmeadow Delete | White Hall, MD 21161 | $327,720 |
9 | Meadow Farm Joint Venture LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $303,667 |
10 | Cold Bottom Farms Inc | Sparks, MD 21152 | $299,179 |
11 | Lippy Bros Inc | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $290,676 |
12 | Spry Brothers Inc | Elkton, MD 21921 | $290,553 |
13 | Roy G Brooks Sr | Easton, MD 21601 | $288,993 |
14 | Harborview Farms | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $288,799 |
15 | Michael R Bostic | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $285,167 |
16 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $280,921 |
17 | Charles T Jamison | Dickerson, MD 20842 | $278,302 |
18 | Philip A Foster & Sons | Trappe, MD 21673 | $277,851 |
19 | Neal Farms Inc | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $271,676 |
20 | William M Knight Sr | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $269,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>