Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,897
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Maryland totaled $24,765,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Harborview Farms | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $593,980 |
2 | Lippy Brothers Farms St | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $226,809 |
3 | Blackwater Farms Inc | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $206,639 |
4 | Clear Meadow Farm Ptr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $199,520 |
5 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $196,725 |
6 | James Nelson Farms Inc | Westover, MD 21871 | $195,211 |
7 | Keith R Leaverton | Trappe, MD 21673 | $182,794 |
8 | Swift Farms Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $180,969 |
9 | Bowles Farms LLC | Loveville, MD 20656 | $179,997 |
10 | Wimberly Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $166,340 |
11 | Lazy Day Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $164,033 |
12 | Neal Farms Partnership | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $150,401 |
13 | Country Heritage Partnership | Worton, MD 21678 | $147,507 |
14 | Saathoff Incorporated | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $144,319 |
15 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $142,998 |
16 | Grimmel Farm Partners | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $142,146 |
17 | Grand View Farm LLC | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $136,045 |
18 | Eric C Schrader | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $134,672 |
19 | Mark Sump | Cordova, MD 21625 | $134,347 |
20 | Sylvester Farms Inc | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $130,975 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>