Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 923
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Maryland totaled $8,199,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Daniel E Bishop | Goldsboro, MD 21636 | $177,497 |
2 | Mrs Janet S Fulton | Boonsboro, MD 21713 | $113,000 |
3 | Fannie Ensor Estate | Dickerson, MD 20842 | $101,651 |
4 | John A Horst | Clear Spring, MD 21722 | $99,000 |
5 | Teabow Inc | Walkersville, MD 21793 | $98,519 |
6 | Wisner Farms Inc | Upperco, MD 21155 | $97,364 |
7 | Horizon Organic Dairy Maryland Fa | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $93,350 |
8 | Randy Sowers | Middletown, MD 21769 | $87,848 |
9 | Glad Mar Dairy Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $84,677 |
10 | David Meck | Saint Georges, DE 19733 | $67,017 |
11 | Wm Blan Harcum Sr | Mardela Springs, MD 21837 | $62,845 |
12 | James H Archer Jr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $59,277 |
13 | Staff-herd Farms | Elkton, MD 21921 | $55,516 |
14 | Phillip H Jones Sr | Huntingtown, MD 20639 | $54,151 |
15 | J H Meadows & Sons | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $53,461 |
16 | Angelica Nurseries Inc | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $50,000 |
17 | Long Green Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $50,000 |
18 | Highland Heights Farm Inc | Street, MD 21154 | $50,000 |
19 | Rutledge Brick House Farm Inc | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $50,000 |
20 | Edward A Burchell | Monkton, MD 21111 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>