Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Carroll County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 341
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Carroll County, Maryland totaled $705,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tomorrow's Promise Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $24,315 |
2 | Herman Steffen | Detour, MD 21757 | $19,455 |
3 | James A Carmack | Keymar, MD 21757 | $15,596 |
4 | Unicorn Associates Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $15,305 |
5 | Joseph A Schwartzbeck Jr | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $14,869 |
6 | Matthew M Hoff | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $12,335 |
7 | Panora Acres Inc | Manchester, MD 21102 | $11,057 |
8 | Lease Brothers Inc | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $10,515 |
9 | Kermit W Martz | Keymar, MD 21757 | $10,268 |
10 | Stanley E Culp | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $9,602 |
11 | Smith & Smith | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $9,525 |
12 | Key De Blue Farm Inc | Keymar, MD 21757 | $9,411 |
13 | Byron Stambaugh | Westminster, MD 21158 | $8,985 |
14 | Donald Belt | Westminster, MD 21158 | $8,798 |
15 | Donald Savage | Mount Airy, MD 21771 | $8,202 |
16 | Blaine A Harman | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $8,178 |
17 | Eric Burall | New Windsor, MD 21776 | $7,705 |
18 | Charles L Lethbridge | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $7,603 |
19 | Frederick O Roelecke Jr | Taneytown, MD 21787 | $7,527 |
20 | Arbaugh's Flowing Springs Inc | Union Bridge, MD 21791 | $7,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>