Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Cecil County, Maryland, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $34,401 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonathan C Quinn | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $7,485 |
| 2 | Rich Levels Grain Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $2,553 |
| 3 | Carroll Davis Dba Chestnut Lane Farm | Earleville, MD 21919 | $2,297 |
| 4 | Foxhole Farm LLC | Galena, MD 21635 | $1,875 |
| 5 | Bright Helmstone Farms Inc | Massey, MD 21650 | $1,704 |
| 6 | Stephen Whitney Isaacson | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $1,632 |
| 7 | Thomas Dill | Warwick, MD 21912 | $1,604 |
| 8 | Wil-o-mar Farms LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $1,399 |
| 9 | Rutkoske Farms | Middletown, DE 19709 | $1,276 |
| 10 | Spry Brothers Inc | Elkton, MD 21921 | $1,195 |
| 11 | Scott Sawyer | Warwick, MD 21912 | $1,131 |
| 12 | Greenfield LLC | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $1,123 |
| 13 | Christopher J Price | Earleville, MD 21919 | $989 |
| 14 | Meulenberg Custom Farming LLC | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $971 |
| 15 | George Clay & Sons Inc | Middletown, DE 19709 | $828 |
| 16 | Peverley-silver LLC | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $818 |
| 17 | David P Davis III | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $748 |
| 18 | Albeck Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $501 |
| 19 | Hughy F Salfner Jr | Warwick, MD 21912 | $405 |
| 20 | Long View Farms Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $401 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf