Total Commodity Programs in Cecil County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cecil County, Maryland totaled $2,542,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kilby Farms LLC | Colora, MD 21917 | $289,809 |
| 2 | Moon Nurseries, Inc. | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $261,526 |
| 3 | Jvw Investments LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Chesapeake Gold Farms Inc | North East, MD 21901 | $138,383 |
| 5 | Vernon S Horst | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $129,498 |
| 6 | Spry Brothers Inc | Elkton, MD 21921 | $117,326 |
| 7 | John Richard Lefever | Quarryville, PA 17566 | $90,363 |
| 8 | Meulenberg Dairy LLC | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $85,231 |
| 9 | Ronald Underwood | North East, MD 21901 | $77,060 |
| 10 | Wil-o-mar Farms LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $68,315 |
| 11 | Long Green Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $66,350 |
| 12 | Farmington Acres LLC | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $60,385 |
| 13 | Hartland Farms Inc | Peach Bottom, PA 17563 | $45,258 |
| 14 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $43,937 |
| 15 | England Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $36,341 |
| 16 | Samuel J Stoltzfus | Earleville, MD 21919 | $35,929 |
| 17 | Greenfield LLC | Cecilton, MD 21913 | $31,692 |
| 18 | Enos Stoltzfus | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $29,934 |
| 19 | Stephen Stoltzfus | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $26,894 |
| 20 | Dividing Farm LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $26,601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf