Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 83
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $853,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mccabe Enterprises Inc | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $5,035 |
22 | Benson Farms Inc | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $4,905 |
23 | Byron Hauck | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $4,881 |
24 | Clinton W Davidson | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $4,196 |
25 | Thomas R West Jr | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $4,126 |
26 | Gerald B Brown | Stockton, MD 21864 | $3,905 |
27 | Dale Hastings Farms LLC | Berlin, MD 21811 | $3,632 |
28 | Brooks Aydelotte | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $3,575 |
29 | Benjamin T Aydelotte | Stockton, MD 21864 | $3,446 |
30 | Bradley B Hauck | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $2,399 |
31 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $2,331 |
32 | John W Carmean | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $2,146 |
33 | Winifred Riley | Berlin, MD 21811 | $2,039 |
34 | Keith Littleton | Berlin, MD 21811 | $1,961 |
35 | Rayne Acres LLC | Willards, MD 21874 | $1,898 |
36 | Carol B Caudell Limited Partnership | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $1,742 |
37 | Shimar Farms Trust Under The Will Of Mark O Pilcha | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,569 |
38 | Matthew W Layfield | Pittsville, MD 21850 | $1,277 |
39 | Eugene Magee | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $1,090 |
40 | William C Cooper | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $984 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”