Total Conservation Programs in Worcester County, Maryland, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 165
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $1,065,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Estate Of Richard E Jones | Columbia, MD 21045 | $84,816 |
2 | Emma Elizabeth Rickards Irrevocable Trust | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $50,000 |
3 | Emily Jean Taylor | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $45,915 |
4 | Coard D Bounds | Berlin, MD 21811 | $32,880 |
5 | William E Davis Sr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $25,515 |
6 | Nancy T Blank | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $24,336 |
7 | Thomas J Johnson III | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $23,647 |
8 | Estate Of Carolyn C Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $22,964 |
9 | Carolyn C Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $22,714 |
10 | Carroll L Overholt | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $21,266 |
11 | Kenneth W Oland | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $20,784 |
12 | Winifred Riley | Berlin, MD 21811 | $20,332 |
13 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $19,820 |
14 | H Watson Powell Sr | Newark, MD 21841 | $19,014 |
15 | Joan C Powell | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $15,274 |
16 | Charles R Jenkins Irrevocable Tru | Ocean City, MD 21843 | $15,128 |
17 | Benjamin Disharoon | Stockton, MD 21864 | $13,134 |
18 | Brooks Aydelotte | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $13,066 |
19 | Bruning Properties LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $12,097 |
20 | Betty Grace Stevens | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $11,984 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>