Total Commodity Programs in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 511
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $56,992,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith Farms Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $2,639,800 |
| 2 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $2,513,946 |
| 3 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $2,081,618 |
| 4 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $1,880,639 |
| 5 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $1,773,909 |
| 6 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,576,715 |
| 7 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,565,410 |
| 8 | F A Holland & Sons | New Church, VA 23415 | $1,432,008 |
| 9 | George H Dryden Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $1,101,045 |
| 10 | Ag Renewal Enterprises Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $1,071,117 |
| 11 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,033,185 |
| 12 | Twin Oak Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,029,041 |
| 13 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $1,028,928 |
| 14 | Richard E Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $938,631 |
| 15 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $925,313 |
| 16 | David F Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $811,119 |
| 17 | H Watson Powell Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $807,332 |
| 18 | Holloway Brothers | Berlin, MD 21811 | $781,998 |
| 19 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $708,234 |
| 20 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $687,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf