Loan Deficiency in Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 481
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Massachusetts totaled $4,682,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louis T Aragi Sr | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $187,363 |
| 2 | Allard's Farms Inc | S Deerfield, MA 01373 | $130,696 |
| 3 | Bar-way Farm Inc | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $107,936 |
| 4 | Antone Moniz Sr | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $104,347 |
| 5 | Earle M Parsons & Sons Inc | Hadley, MA 01035 | $92,612 |
| 6 | Country Ayre Farm | Spencer, MA 01562 | $84,597 |
| 7 | Five Point Farm | Northfield, MA 01360 | $77,654 |
| 8 | Santos Brothers Farm | Westport, MA 02790 | $73,861 |
| 9 | Gordon Smith Dba Fort River Farm | Hadley, MA 01035 | $68,450 |
| 10 | Devine Farms Inc | Hadley, MA 01035 | $64,614 |
| 11 | Yazwinski Farm Partnership | Deerfield, MA 01342 | $54,514 |
| 12 | Larkin - Batacchi Farm | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $54,478 |
| 13 | River Maple Farm Inc | Bernardston, MA 01337 | $50,196 |
| 14 | Walnut Hill Farm | Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 | $48,132 |
| 15 | Larkin Farm LLC | Sheffield, MA 01257 | $47,615 |
| 16 | Joseph Radwilowicz Dba Sodom Mt F | Southwick, MA 01077 | $46,992 |
| 17 | Turner Farms Inc | South Egremont, MA 01258 | $44,216 |
| 18 | Joyner Dairy Farm Inc. | Cummington, MA 01026 | $44,092 |
| 19 | Luther Belden Inc | N Hatfield, MA 01066 | $43,144 |
| 20 | Fairfields Dairy Farm LLC | Williamstown, MA 01267 | $41,899 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf