Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Essex County, Massachusetts, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Essex County, Massachusetts totaled $184,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rogers Spring Hill Farm Inc | Ward Hill, MA 01835 | $24,758 |
2 | Matthew Kozazcki | Newbury, MA 01951 | $23,943 |
3 | Cto-chf Partners | Amesbury, MA 01913 | $21,650 |
4 | Sargent Farm LLC | Merrimac, MA 01860 | $19,908 |
5 | Marini Farm | Ipswich, MA 01938 | $16,523 |
6 | Hardys Creek Broiler Farm | Essex, MA 01929 | $15,063 |
7 | Herrick Dairy Farm LLC | Rowley, MA 01969 | $8,964 |
8 | Russell Orchards Inc | Ipswich, MA 01938 | $8,595 |
9 | Robert D Connors | Danvers, MA 01923 | $8,026 |
10 | George R Barker Jr | North Andover, MA 01845 | $7,935 |
11 | Canaan Farms | Wenham, MA 01984 | $6,603 |
12 | Peter Gibney | Danvers, MA 01923 | $4,605 |
13 | H Michael Smolak | North Andover, MA 01845 | $4,575 |
14 | Herrick & Son | Rowley, MA 01969 | $2,565 |
15 | Long Hill Orchards | West Newbury, MA 01985 | $2,465 |
16 | Cold Springs Farm | Salisbury, MA 01952 | $2,287 |
17 | Richard M Chase | Newburyport, MA 01950 | $1,940 |
18 | David Tombarelli | Bradford, MA 01835 | $1,860 |
19 | Laurence Dansereau | Merrimac, MA 01860 | $836 |
20 | Vincent M Marini | Ipswich, MA 01938 | $435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>