Counter Cyclical Program in Bay County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 780
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $2,822,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deshano Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $82,028 |
| 2 | Stockmeyer Family Farms | Reese, MI 48757 | $57,242 |
| 3 | Meylan Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $56,548 |
| 4 | M & D Huber Farms | Auburn, MI 48611 | $49,262 |
| 5 | Johnsons Farm Co Inc | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $42,957 |
| 6 | K & H Farms | Midland, MI 48642 | $39,912 |
| 7 | Rueger Farms Inc | Standish, MI 48658 | $36,766 |
| 8 | D & J Helmreich Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $36,333 |
| 9 | Helmreich Farms Inc | Freeland, MI 48623 | $35,112 |
| 10 | Saginaw Bay Farms | Bay City, MI 48708 | $34,428 |
| 11 | Floyd A Meyer | Bay City, MI 48706 | $33,829 |
| 12 | D & D Schultz Farms | Linwood, MI 48634 | $33,805 |
| 13 | J Wm Schmidt | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $30,726 |
| 14 | Dore Farms LLC | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $30,188 |
| 15 | Schindler Farms LLC | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $29,753 |
| 16 | Frank Farms Inc | Bay City, MI 48706 | $28,219 |
| 17 | Mieske Farms Inc | Linwood, MI 48634 | $28,165 |
| 18 | Kenneth L Schmidt | Bentley, MI 48613 | $27,513 |
| 19 | Michael J Krzyzaniak | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $26,651 |
| 20 | Weber Dairy Farms LLC | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $26,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf