Farm Subsidy information
Chippewa County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Chippewa County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 189
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chippewa County, Michigan totaled $2,157,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Andrea M Mcdonald | Pickford, MI 49774 | $482,302 |
2 | Sault Ste Marie Tribe Of Chippewa | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $324,948 |
3 | Taylor Creek Farm LLC | Pickford, MI 49774 | $171,300 |
4 | Sweet Grass Farms LLC | Pickford, MI 49774 | $136,778 |
5 | E Michael Fairchild | Drummond Island, MI 49726 | $88,817 |
6 | Folkersma Farm LLC | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $57,909 |
7 | Robert J Schwiderson | Dafter, MI 49724 | $51,209 |
8 | Hoolsema Dairy Inc | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $47,802 |
9 | Robert L Love | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $45,143 |
10 | James R Love | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $43,082 |
11 | Brent And Gerald Cottle | Pickford, MI 49774 | $37,321 |
12 | Eric Wallis | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $30,029 |
13 | Spencer Shunk Jr | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $29,230 |
14 | Rmg Maple Products Inc | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $25,835 |
15 | Anthony W Bergstrom | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $24,836 |
16 | Pm Land & Cattle | Dafter, MI 49724 | $23,566 |
17 | John Hill | Brimley, MI 49715 | $21,168 |
18 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $20,427 |
19 | Michael Andrews | Dafter, MI 49724 | $18,703 |
20 | Timothy L Andrews | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $17,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>