Total Commodity Programs in Delta County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 291
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Delta County, Michigan totaled $9,879,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wood Fiber Inc | Niagara, WI 54151 | $743,211 |
| 2 | Plum Creek Marketing Inc | Crossett, AR 71635 | $587,372 |
| 3 | Allen Porath | Bark River, MI 49807 | $427,638 |
| 4 | Van Drese Farms | Cornell, MI 49818 | $362,488 |
| 5 | Hanson Seed Farm LLC | Cornell, MI 49818 | $357,309 |
| 6 | Tjj Van Damme Farms | Rock, MI 49880 | $328,427 |
| 7 | Verbrigghe Potato Farm | Rock, MI 49880 | $317,256 |
| 8 | Herioux Farms LLC | Bark River, MI 49807 | $286,609 |
| 9 | Miron And Son Dairy Farm | Cornell, MI 49818 | $268,617 |
| 10 | Marvin Nelson Forest Products Inc | Cornell, MI 49818 | $249,265 |
| 11 | Barron Farms | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $211,242 |
| 12 | Jim Meyers | Bark River, MI 49807 | $198,662 |
| 13 | Rocky Ridge Dairy Farm Inc | Garden, MI 49835 | $198,368 |
| 14 | Hughes Maple Leaf Farm, LLC | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $178,461 |
| 15 | Gerald J Ledvina | Rock, MI 49880 | $173,336 |
| 16 | John Jorasz | Wilson, MI 49896 | $154,035 |
| 17 | Jorasz Bros Dairy Farm | Wilson, MI 49896 | $151,874 |
| 18 | V Merton Wallace | Bark River, MI 49807 | $149,704 |
| 19 | Casey G Johnson | Bark River, MI 49807 | $135,862 |
| 20 | James Dalgord | Garden, MI 49835 | $126,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf