Total Commodity Programs in Huron County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,083
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $49,852,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bischer Farms Partnership | Ruth, MI 48470 | $1,822,393 |
| 2 | Te Voortwis Dairy LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,366,245 |
| 3 | Highland Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $1,122,543 |
| 4 | Aquila Farms LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,096,671 |
| 5 | Rathmourne Dairy LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,000,000 |
| 6 | Jahn Farms LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,000,000 |
| 7 | Dekker Dairy Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $942,381 |
| 8 | W.a. Herford & Sons Farms, Inc. | Elkton, MI 48731 | $904,765 |
| 9 | Wil Le Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $799,402 |
| 10 | Trost Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $780,644 |
| 11 | Roundtree Dairy LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $691,627 |
| 12 | Oak River Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $588,801 |
| 13 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $548,267 |
| 14 | Dynasty Dairy LLC | Ruth, MI 48470 | $529,104 |
| 15 | Bayside Livestock L L C | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $510,713 |
| 16 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $498,174 |
| 17 | Active Feed Company Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $457,847 |
| 18 | Darrin Siemen | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $449,642 |
| 19 | Grekowicz Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $432,368 |
| 20 | Herford Brothers | Elkton, MI 48731 | $409,337 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf